concrete etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
concrete etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

11 Temmuz 2014 Cuma

Soguk Havada Beton Dokumu

SOĞUK HAVADA BETON DÖKÜMÜ
( Çevre Sıcaklığı Ortalama 5 0C’den az )

                                         DOĞRULAR                                 YANLIŞLAR               

ÇİMENTO   Dozaj                       En az 300 kg/m3                                          En çok 300 kg/m3
                      Cinsi           PÇ-42.5  türü, Erken Yüksek             Tras, Cüruf, Uçucu Kül vb.
                                         Dayanımlı Çimento                            Katkılı Çimento

SU                                    En çok 80 0C’a dek ısıtmak               Soğuk Su kullanmak


AGREGA                        En çok 60 0C’a dek ısıtmak               Soğuk Agrega kullanmak

KATKI MADDESİ                       Normal Akışkan.-hızlandırıcı              Normal Akışkan.-geciktirici
     *(ASTM C-494 e göre)                                       (Tip E)*                                            (Tip D)
                                              
                                               Priz hızlandırıcı           (Tip C)            Priz geciktirici          (Tip B)   

            Süper Akışkanlaştırıcı            Süper Akışkan.-geciktirici
                                                                           (Tip F)                                               (Tip G)

                                         Priz/Sertleşme Hızlandırıcılı
Süper Akışkanlaştırıcı                   
                                                                   
KALIP                              Ahşap kalıp                                        Çelik kalıp
İlâve takviye                                      Takviye yapmama
                                          Kesitler oval                                       Kesitler köşeli

KORUMA                        Yalıtımlı örtü ile örtmek                      Açıkta bırakmak
Rüzgârdan korumak

ISITMA                             Ortamı ısıtmak                                   Ortamı soğutmak
(Buharla)                                            Ateşle ısıtmak
                 
İNŞAAT YÖNTEMİ          Prefabrikasyon                                  Yerinde döküm
Yerinde döküm(korumalı)                 (korumasız)

ÇALIŞMA ZAMANI         Gündüz                                              Gece

KUM’ un                          Kapalı ortamda                                  Açıkta
DEPOLANMASI

TAZE BETON      <  50 cm        ise      En az 15 0C  olmalı                                       
SICAKLIĞI**         50 – 150        ise      En az 10 0C      "                                    
(kalınlığa              > 150 cm         ise      En az   5 0C      "                                    
 bağlı olarak)        
                           
  **NOT : Dış ortam sıcaklığı düştükçe de taze beton sıcaklığı artırılmalıdır.



Hazırlayan : Mehmet MUTLU

The History of Concrete

A Timeline

Cement has been around for at least 12 million years. When the earth itself was undergoing intense geologic changes natural, cement was being created. It was this natural cement that humans first put to use. Eventually, they discovered how to make cement from other materials.


12,000,000 BC
Reactions between limestone and oil shale during spontaneous combustion occurred in Israel to form a natural deposit of cement compounds. The deposits were characterized by Israeli geologists in the 1960's and 70's.
3000 BC
Egyptians
Used mud mixed with straw to bind dried bricks. They also used gypsum mortars and mortars of lime in the pyramids.
Chinese
Used cementitious materials to hold bamboo together in their boats and in the Great Wall.
800 BC
Greeks, Crete & Cyprus
Used lime mortars which were much harder than later Roman mortars.
300 BC
Babylonians & As Syrians
Used bitumen to bind stones and bricks.
300 BC - 476 AD
Romans
Used pozzolana cement from Pozzuoli, Italy near Mt. Vesuvius to build the Appian Way, Roman baths, the Coliseum and Pantheon in Rome, and the Pont du Gard aqueduct in south France. They used lime as a cementitious material. Pliny reported a mortar mixture of 1 part lime to 4 parts sand. Vitruvius reported a 2 parts pozzolana to 1 part lime. Animal fat, milk, and blood were used as admixtures (substances added to cement to increase the properties.) These structures still exist today!
1200 - 1500
The Middle Ages
The quality of cementing materials deteriorated. The use of burning lime and pozzolan (admixture) was lost, but reintroduced in the 1300's.
1678
Joseph Moxon wrote about a hidden fire in heated lime that appears upon the addition of water.
1779
Bry Higgins was issued a patent for hydraulic cement (stucco) for exterior plastering use.
1780
Bry Higgins published "Experiments and Observations Made With the View of Improving the Art of Composing and Applying Calcereous Cements and of Preparing Quicklime."
1793
John Smeaton found that the calcination of limestone containing clay gave a lime which hardened under water (hydraulic lime). He used hydraulic lime to rebuild Eddystone Lighthouse in Cornwall, England which he had been commissioned to build in 1756, but had to first invent a material that would not be affected by water. He wrote a book about his work.
1796
James Parker from England patented a natural hydraulic cement by calcining nodules of impure limestone containing clay, called Parker's Cement or Roman Cement.
1802
In France, a similar Roman Cement process was used.
1810
Edgar Dobbs received a patent for hydraulic mortars, stucco, and plaster, although they were of poor quality due to lack of kiln precautions.
1812 -1813
Louis Vicat of France prepared artificial hydraulic lime by calcining synthetic mixtures of limestone and clay.
1818
Maurice St. Leger was issued patents for hydraulic cement. Natural Cement was produced in the USA. Natural cement is limestone that naturally has the appropriate amounts of clay to make the same type of concrete as John Smeaton discovered.
1820 - 1821
John Tickell and Abraham Chambers were issued more hydraulic cement patents.
1822
James Frost of England prepared artificial hydraulic lime like Vicat's and called it British Cement.
1824
Joseph Aspdin of England invented portland cement by burning finely ground chalk with finely divided clay in a lime kiln until carbon dioxide was driven off. The sintered product was then ground and he called it portland cement named after the high quality building stones quarried at Portland, England.
1828
I. K. Brunel is credited with the first engineering application of portland cement, which was used to fill a breach in the Thames Tunnel.
1830
The first production of lime and hydraulic cement took place in Canada.
1836
The first systematic tests of tensile and compressive strength took place in Germany.
1843
J. M. Mauder, Son & Co. were licensed to produce patented portland cement.
1845
Isaac Johnson claims to have burned the raw materials of portland cement to clinkering temperatures.
1849
Pettenkofer & Fuches performed the first accurate chemical analysis of portland cement.
1860
The beginning of the era of portland cements of modern composition.
1862
Blake Stonebreaker of England introduced the jaw breakers to crush clinkers.
1867
Joseph Monier of France reinforced William Wand's (USA) flower pots with wire ushering in the idea of iron reinforcing bars (re-bar).
1871
David Saylor was issued the first American patent for portland cement. He showed the importance of true clinkering.
1880
J. Grant of England show the importance of using the hardest and densest portions of the clinker. Key ingredients were being chemically analyzed.
1886
The first rotary kiln was introduced in England to replace the vertical shaft kilns.
1887
Henri Le Chatelier of France established oxide ratios to prepare the proper amount of lime to produce portland cement. He named the components: Alite (tricalcium silicate), Belite (dicalcium silicate), and Celite (tetracalcium aluminoferrite). He proposed that hardening is caused by the formation of crystalline products of the reaction between cement and water.
1889
The first concrete reinforced bridge is built.
1890
The addition of gypsum when grinding clinker to act as a retardant to the setting of concrete was introduced in the USA. Vertical shaft kilns were replaced with rotary kilns and ball mills were used for grinding cement.
1891
George Bartholomew placed the first concrete street in the USA in Bellefontaine, OH. It still exists today!
1893
William Michaelis claimed that hydrated metasilicates form a gelatinous mass (gel) that dehydrates over time to harden.
1900
Basic cement tests were standardized.
1903
The first concrete high rise was built in Cincinnati, OH.
1908
Thomas Edison built cheap, cozy concrete houses in Union, NJ. They still exist today!
1909
Thomas Edison was issued a patent for rotary kilns.
1929
Dr. Linus Pauling of the USA formulated a set of principles for the structures of complex silicates.
1930
Air entraining agents were introduced to improve concrete's resistance to freeze/thaw damage.
1936
The first major concrete dams, Hoover Dam and Grand Coulee Dam, were built. They still exist today!
1956
U.S. Congress annexed the Federal Interstate Highway Act.
1967
First concrete domed sport structure, the Assembly Hall, was constructed at The University of Illinois, at Urbana-Champaign.
1970's
Fiber reinforcement in concrete was introduced.
1975
CN Tower in Toronto, Canada, the tallest slip-form building, was constructed.
Water Tower Place in Chicago, Illinois, the tallest building was constructed.
1980's
Superplasticizers were introduced as admixtures.
1985
Silica fume was introduced as a pozzolanic additive.
The "highest strength" concrete was used in building the Union Plaza constructed in Seattle, Washington.
1992
The tallest reinforced concrete building in the world was constructed at 311 S. Wacker Dr., Chicago, Illinois.


8 Temmuz 2014 Salı

What is mass concrete

A question often arises as to exactly what is considered to be mass concrete. According to ACI 116R,1 mass concrete is defined as “any volume of concrete with dimensions large enough to require that measures be taken to cope with generation of heat from hydration of the cement and attendant volume change, to minimize cracking.” Because this definition doesn’t provide a specific measure, many agencies have developed their own definitions of mass concrete. 


For example, mass concrete is defined by some agencies as “any concrete element having a least dimension greater than 3 ft (0.9 m).” Under this definition, a large mat foundation with a thickness of 3 ft (0.9 m) would not be considered mass concrete, but a large mat foundation with a thickness of 3.25 ft (1 m) would be considered mass concrete.

Other agencies use different minimum dimensions, ranging from 1.5 to 6.5 ft (0.46 to 2.0 m), depending on
past experience. Note that none of these definitions considers the cementitious material content of the concrete. Temperatures within a concrete element will be much different if high-performance or high-early-strength concrete is used rather than typical structural concrete.

1 Temmuz 2014 Salı

Strength Of Concrete


The strength of concrete appears to be a good index, whether direct or inverse, of most of the other properties of practical significance. In general, stronger concretes are stiffer, more nearly water-tight, and more resistant to weathering and certain destructive agencies. On the other hand, stronger concretes usually exhibit higher drying shrinkage and lower extensibility, hence are more liable to cracking. These relationships, together with the fact that strength tests are relatively simple to make, form the basis for the common use of strength in specifying and controlling quality and in evaluating the effects of variable factors such as materials, proportions, manufacturing equipments, methods, and curing conditions.

NATURE OF STRENGTH
Definition of strength with regard to concrete (unless otherwise stated) is unit force (stress) required to cause rupture. Rupture may be caused by applied tensile stress (failure in cohesion), by applied shear stress (sliding), or by compressive (crushing) stress. However, a brittle material such as concrete is much weaker in tension and in shear than in compression, and failures of concrete specimens under compressive load are essentially shear failures on oblique planes. Since the resistance to failure is due to both cohesion and internal friction, the angle of rupture is not 45° (plane of maximum shear stress) but is a function of the internal friction angle φ; the angle α which the plane of failure makes with the axis of loading is equal to 45 - φ/2. The internal friction angle for concrete is approximately 20°. The nature of failure is illustrated in FIG 6.1.



FIG. 6.1. Representation of failure of concrete under compressive load.

FACTORS AFFECTING STRENGTH
Strength of concrete has three components: (1) Strength of the cement paste, (2) Strength of the aggregate, and (3) Bond between the paste and the aggregate. Generally speaking, the first item is primarily related with the porosity; the second item is not a big problem as long as the aggregate is sound; and the third one is related mainly with the particle shape and the maximum size of the aggregate.

Strength of Paste as Related to Concrete Strength:
Powers' gel/space ratio law states that the "strength of Portland Cement mortars is directly proportional to the increase in (gel/space ratio) regardless of age, original W/C ratio, or type of cement. The gel/space ratio, X, is the ratio of solid hydration products volume to the space available for these products. In other words, the gel/space ratio is a representation of the capillary porosity of the paste in terms of its measurable parameters. It is given as follows:

It has been found that the relationship between compressive strength (σc) and the gel/space ratio can be written as σc = AXn where, A is a constant representing the strength of the gel at X =1.0
n is a constant having values in the range of 2.6 to 3.0 depending on the characteristics of cement.
This relationship can be written as σc=235 X3 kgf/cm2  for portland cement concretes.
Summarizing, for a given cement, strength of the paste depends on (1) cement content (C), (2) water content (Wo), (3) age (α), and (4) air content (Ao).

Water-Cement Ratio:
Even though the strength of concrete is dependent largely on the capillary porosity or gel/space ratio, the quantities are not easy to measure or predict. Therefore, they are not suitable for practical purposes.
Fortunately, however, capillary porosity of a properly compacted concrete at any degree of hydration is determined by the W/C ratio. Therefore, in practice, the strength of a properly compacted concrete can be assured by specifying the W/C ratio. The relationship between W/C ratio and compressive strength is given in FIG. 6.2.
FIG. 6.2. Relationship between compressive strength and W/C ratio.

Time:
Gain of strength with time is basically related with the increase in gel/space ratio due to the increase of α value. However the rate of strength gain is also dependent on (1) characteristics of the cement, (2) curing conditions, and W/C ratio of the mix. Generally speaking, coarser cement particles (∼25μm) contribute to late strength (>28 days) and finer cement particles (∼5μm) contribute to early strength (<7 days="" font="" gain="" high-w="" low-w="" mixes.="" mixes="" more="" rapidly="" ratio="" strength="" than="">
In practice, it is common to obtain 7-day as well as 28-day compressive strength tests. Thus, it becomes possible to extrapolate the 28-day strength from 7-day (or other) strengths. Of course, this depends on the type of the cement and curing temperature, but as a general rule, the ratio of 28-day to 7-day strength lies between 1.3 and 1.7.
Age  1-d 3-d 7-d 28-d 3-m 6-m 12-m
Strength Ratio 0.15 0.45 0.67 1.0 1.16 1.20 1.24
Maturity:
The hydration of cement is greatly affected by both the time and the temperature of hydration, so the gain in strength of concrete is also largely controlled by these two factors. There had been a considerable amount of research on how to express strength as a function of time and temperature. Out of these studies came the concept of maturity which is defined as some function of the product of curing time t and curing temperature T.
The maturity function that best correlates with the strength of concrete is the "Nurse-Saul Expression":
maturity (°C • days) = Σ at (T+10)
where at is the time of curing in days and T is the temperature in °C.
There are certain limitations to the use of maturity for predicting concrete strengths:
1. Maturity functions do not take into consideration the effect of humidity conditions.
2. Proposed functions can not be applied to mass concrete, because the rate of heat loss from such concrete is much less than that from normal members. In other words, only the ambient heat is considered but the effect of heat of hydration is ignored.
3. Maturity functions are not applicable to very low maturities.
4. Type of cement, W/C ratio, etc. are not considered in these functions.
5. Accelerated curing may lead to contradictory results.
Nevertheless, in spite of these limitations, the maturity concept may be useful when trying to establish the strength of concrete in a structure at some previous time. This may be done by measuring the core strengths at some time and then using the maturity functions to estimate the strength at some earlier time. Also, the maturity concept can be used to estimate the appropriate time for form removal when concreting at lower-than-normal temperatures.
Maximum Size of Aggregate:
In practice maximum size of aggregate is limited by member dimensions and minimum reinforcement bar spacing. Below these structural limitations, various maximum sizes can be used. For smaller aggregate sizes, bonding surface between the aggregate and the paste is larger, therefore the interfacial bond is stronger. However, in this case, water requirement for a specified workability becomes higher and paste gets weaker. On the other hand, larger aggregate particles provide more restraint on volume changes in the paste and thus may induce additional stresses in the paste, which tend to weaken the concrete. This effect is offset, however, by the reduced water content necessary to achieve a given workability. In general, there is an optimum maximum aggregate size to give highest strength.
Rate of Loading:
Slow or rapid rates of loading may give misleading strength results. Therefore, standards always specify ranges for loading rates. For compressive strength testing this rate is ~ 2 kgf/cm2/sec. Loads applied slower than standard rates cause creep and reduce the apparent strength.
6.3. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
Compressive strength is the most significant strength for concrete since the concrete members are primarily designed for compressive loads. Furthermore, some reliable correlations exist between the compressive strength and other strengths and properties of practical significance.
Certain characteristics of the testing machine may affect the compressive strength of concrete. Testing machines may be classified as "hard" (very rigid machines) and "soft" (less rigid machines). In very soft machines, the energy stored in the machine is released as the specimen begins to fail; this additional energy will cause greater crack propagation and failure at lower loads than with very rigid machines, which cannot release their energies as easily.
Different types of platens can lead to different results, too. The effects of using "hard " and "soft" platens are illustrated in Fig.6.3. The difference in the properties of the steel platen of the test machine and those of the concrete specimen will lead to certain discrepancies at the "ends" of the specimen. In other words, concrete near the steel platen will be in lateral compression. This is called the "end effect". It diminishes at a certain distance from the ends. When the length of the specimen is ≥1.7 times its diameter, the effect of the distorted region is eliminated. This is the reason why length-to-diameter ratio (l/d) of 2 is used. The mathematical explanation of the “end effect” is described below.
Fig. 6.3 Specimen deformation and normal stress distribution for (a) hard and (b) soft platens
εxs : lateral strain in steel
εxc : lateral strain in concrete

30 Haziran 2014 Pazartesi

Durability Of Concrete

A properly designed, produced and cured concrete is inherently durable to the environments it will be exposed. Besides, a carefully produced concrete with good quality control is capable of maintenance-free performance for decades without the need for protective coatings, except in highly corrosive environments. However, concrete is potentially susceptible to attack in variety of different exposures unless certain precautions are taken. Deterioration of concrete can be caused by the adverse performance of any one of the three major components: aggregate, paste or reinforcement, and can be due to either chemical or physical causes (Table 2.1). ın most of the cases, an individual environment factor initiates distress, then other factors may contribute and aggravate the situation.
A major difficulty in studying durability is predicting concrete behavior several decades in the future on the basis of short-term tests. Most of the knowledge of the durability has been accumulated through a direct study of actual field problems. The prediction of concrete durability under a variety of service conditions, is still a major problem.

Table 2.1. Durability of Concrete
Chemical Attack
Physical Attack
Leaching  and  efflorescence (P)
Freezing and Thawing (P, A)
Sulfate Attack (P)
Wetting and Drying (P)
Alkali – Aggregate Reaction (A)
Temperature Changes (P, A)
Acids and Alkalis (P)
Wear and Abrasion (P, A)
Re-bar Corrosion (R)



  Letters in parenthesis indicates the concrete component most affected, in order of importance: A=>Aggregate ; P=> Paste ; R=> Reinforcement
Water is generally involved in every form of concrete deterioration, and in porous solids permeability of the material to water usually determines the rate of deterioration. Therefore, in this chapter the structure and properties of water are described with special reference to its destructive effect on porous materials; then the permeability of cement paste, aggregates and concrete as well as the factors controlling their permeability are discussed.
Physical effects that adversely influence the durability of concrete include surface wear, cracking due to crystallization pressure of salts in pores, and exposure to extreme temperatures. Deleterious chemical effects include leaching of the cement paste by acidic solutions, and expansive reactions involving sulfate attack, alkali-aggregate reaction and rebar corrosion in concrete. The significance, physical manifestations, mechanism, and control of various causes of concrete deterioration are discussed in detail.

Definition:  durability is generally considered synonymous with “long service life”. Since durability under one set of conditions does not necessarily mean durability under another, it is customary to include a general reference to the environment when defining durability. According to ACI Committee 210, durability of Portland cement concrete is defined as its ability to resist weathering action, chemical attack, abrasion, or any other process of deterioration that is, durable concrete will retain its original form, quality and serviceability when exposed to its environment.
Generally, as a result of environmental interactions the microstructure and consequently, the properties of materials change with time. A material is assumed to reach the end of service life when its properties under given conditions of use have deteriorated to an extent that the continuing use of the material is ruled either unsafe or uneconomical.

Significance:  it is generally accepted now that in designing structures the durability characteristics of the materials under consideration should be evaluated as carefully as other aspects such as mechanical properties and initial cost.
Mostly a substantial portion of the total construction budget is used for the repair and replacement of existing structures arising from material failures. For example, it is estimated that in industrially developed countries, over 40% of the total resources of the building industry are applied to repair and maintenance of existing structures, and less than 60% to new installations. The escalation in replacement cost of structures and the growing demand on life-cycle cost rather than first cost are forcing engineers to become durability conscious. Furthermore, a close relationship exists between durability of materials and ecology. Conservation of natural resources by making materials having longer service life is, after all, an ecological step. Besides, the uses of concrete are being extended to new applications, such as offshore platforms, containers for handling liquefied gases at cryogenic temperatures and high pressure reaction vessels in the nuclear industry.

General Observations:   before a discussion of important aspects of durability of concrete, a few general remarks on the subject will be helpful.
1. Water, the primary cause of both creation and destruction of many natural materials, is also control to most important durability problems in concrete. In porous solids, water is the case of many types of physical process of degradation. As a  carrier of aggressive ions, water can also be a source of chemical process of degradation.
2. The physico-chemical phenomena associated with water movement in porous solids are controlled by the permeability of the solid. For example, the rate of chemical deterioration would depend on whether the chemical attack is limited to the surface of concrete or whether it is also work inside the material.
3. The rate of deterioration is also affected by the concentration level of ions in water and by the composition of solids. Due to the presence of alkali calcium compounds in hydration products of Portland cement, unlike many natural rocks and minerals, concrete is a basic material. Therefore, acidic waters are expected to be harmful to it.
Most of our knowledge of physico-chemical processes responsible for concrete deterioration comes from case histories of structures in the field, because it is difficult in the laboratory to simulate the combination of long-term conditions normally present in real life. However, in practice, deterioration of concrete is seldom due to a single cause; usually, at advanced stages of material degradation more than one deleterious phenomena are found at work. In general, various causes of deterioration are so closely intertwined and an interacting so that even separation of the cause from the effect often becomes impossible. Therefore, a classification of concrete deterioration processes into neat categories should be treated with some care. Since the purpose of such classifications is to explain, systematically and individually, the various phenomena involved, there is a tendency to overlook the interactions when several phenomena are present simultaneously.


2.1.Water as an Agent of Deterioration

Water is the most aboundant fluid in nature in the form of seawater, groundwater, rivers, lakes, rain, snow and vapor. Being small, water molecules are capable of penetrating extremely fine pores or cavities. As a solvent, water is able to dissolve more substances than any other liquid. This is due to the presence of many ions and gases in some waters, which in turn, become instrumental in causing chemical decomposition of solid materials.
It may also be noted that eater has the highest heat of vaporization among the common liquids, therefore, at ordinary temperatures it has the tendency to remain in a material in the liquid state, rather than to vaporize and the material dry.  
In porous solids, internal movements and changes of structure of water are known to cause disruptive volume changes. For example, freezing water into ice, formation of ordered structure of water inside fine pores, development of osmotic pressure due to differences in ionic concentration, and hydrostatic pressure build up by differential vapor pressures can lead to high internal stresses within a moist solid. A brief review of the water structure will be useful for understanding these phenomena.

2.1.1.  Structure of Water

The H-O-H molecule is covalently bonded. Due to asymmetric character of water molecule, the charge centers of hydrogen and oxygen are different. Thus the porosity charged proton of the hydrogen ion belonging to a water molecule attracts the negatively charged electrons of the neighboring water molecules. This relatively weak force of attraction, called the hydrogen bond is responsible for the ordered structure of water.
The highest manifestation of the long-range order in the structure of water due to hydrogen bonding is seen in ice (Fig 2.1.a). Each molecule of water in ice is surrounded by other four molecules, one molecule at the center and four molecules at the corners of tetrahedron. In all three directions the molecule and groups of molecules are held together by hydrogen bonds. When ice melts at 0°C ~15% of the hydrogen bonds breakdown in directionality of the tetrahedral bond, thus, each water molecule can acquire more than four nearest neighbors, which causes the density to rise from 0.917 to 1. Upon solidification of liquid water, reverse process occurs, thus expansion forms rather than contraction. 



      
Fig. 2.1. a) Structure of ice ; b) structure of oriented water molecules in micro pore. (The structure and properties of water affected by temperature and by the size of pores in a solid).
Compared to the structure of ice, water at room temperature has about 50% of the hydrogen bonds broken. Materials in the broken-bond state have unsatisfied surface charges, which give rise to surface energy. The surface energy in liquids causes surface tension, which accounts for the tendency of a large number of molecules to adhere together. It is the high surface tension of water (defined as the force required to pull the water molecules apart) which prevents it from acting as an efficient plasticizing agent in concrete mixes until suitable admixtures are added.
Formation of oriented structure of water by hydration bonding in micropores causes expansion. In solids the surface energy is more when numerous fine pores are present. If water is able to permeat such micropores, and if the forces of attraction at the surface of pores are strong enough to break down the surface tension of bulk water and orient the molecules to an ordered structure (analogous to the structure of ice), this oriented or ordered water, being less dense than the bulk water, will require more space and will therefore tend to cause expansion (Fig 2.1-b)

2.2.Permeability

Water as a necessary ingredient for the cement hydration and as a plasticizing agent for concrete components is found in the structure of concrete from beginning. Gradually, depending on the ambient conditions and the thickness of a concrete element, most of the evaporable water in concrete, will be lost leaving the pores unsaturated or empty. Since it is the evaporable water which is freezable and also free for internal movement, the concrete will not be vulnerable to water-related destructive phenomena, provided that there is a little or no evaporable water left drying, and provided that the subsequent exposure of the concrete to environment does not lead to resaturation of the pores. The resaturation of the pores to a large extent depends on the hydraulic conductivity, formed as (coefficient of) permeability (K).
Many attempts have been made to relate the microstructural parameters of cement hydration products with either diffusivity (the rate of diffusion of ions through water-filled pores) or permeability.  (The rate of viscous flow of fluids through the pore structure).
According to Garboezi as cited by Mehta, for a variety of reasons the diffusivity predictions need more development and validation before their practical usefulness can be proven therefore, in this course only permeability is discussed, implying that this property covers the overall fluid transport characteristic of the material.
Permeability is defined as the property that governs the rate of flow of a fluid into a porous solid. For steady-state flow, the coefficient of permeability (K) is determined from Darcy’s expression:

Where        : rate of fluid flow
              µ           : viscosity of the fluid
              ΔH      : pressure gradient
              A         : the surface area
              L          : thickness of the solid
The coefficient of permeability of a concrete to gas or water vapor is much lower than the coefficient for liquid water, therefore, tests for measurements of permeability are generally carried out using water that has no dissolved air. Besides, due to their interactions with cement paste the permeabilities of solutions containing ions would be different from the water (pure water) permeability.

2.2.1.  Permeability of Cement Paste

In a hcp the size and continuity of the pores at any stage during the hydration process would control the coefficient of permeability. The mixing water is indirectly responsible for permeability of the hcp, because its content determines first the total space available for hydration products and subsequently the unfilled space after the water is consumed by either cement hydration reactions or evaporation to the environment. Generally the permeability of hcp is controlled by W/C ratio and degree of hydration as shown below:
***Lets consider the hydration process of 1cc cement, accepting that 1 cc cement upon full hydration produces 2.1 cc hydration products.
For W/C = 0,40 by weight
Weight of cement èWc = 1 x 3,15 = 3,15 g
Weight of water è Ww = 0,40 x 3,15 = 1,26 g
Volume of water è Vw = 1,26 cc


For 50% hydration
Volume of hydrated cement Vhc = 0.5 cc
Vhp = 0.5 x 2.1 = 1.05 ml volume of hydration products
Vcp = Total volume - Volume of hydration products - Volume of unhydrated cement
Vcp = 2.26 - 0.50 - 1.05 = 0.71 cc



For 100% hydration
Volume of hydrated cement Vhc = 1 cc
Vhp = 1 x 2.1 = 2.1 ml volume of hydration products
Vcp = Total volume - Volume of hydration products - Volume of unhydrated cement
Vcp = 2.26 - 2.1 = 0.16 cc










*** Lets repeat the same problem for W/C = 0.80
Vc = 1 cc
Wc = 1 x 3,15 = 3,15 g
Ww = 0,80 x 3,15 = 2.52 g
Vw = 2.52 cc

For 50 % hydration   è Vhp= 0,5.(2,1)=1,05 ;
      Vcp = 3,52 - 0,5 - 1,05 = 1,97 cc

For 100 % hydration è Vhp = 1,0 . (2,1) = 2,10  ;
      Vcp = 3,52 - 2,10 = 1,42 ml
The coefficient of permeability of freshly mixed cement paste is of the order of 10-4 to 10-5 cm/s with the progress of hydration both the capillary porosity and coefficient of permeability decrease. However there is no direct proportionality between the two. This is because, in the beginning, as the cement hydration process progresses even a small decrease in the total capillary porosity is associated with considerable segmentation of large pores, thus greatly reducing the size and number of channels of flow in the cement paste. Typically, 30% capillary porosity represents a point when the interconnections between the pores have already become so tortuous that a further decrease in porosity of the paste is not accompanied by a substantial decrease in the permeability coefficient.
In general, when W/C ratio is high and the degree of hydration is low, the cement paste will have high capillary porosity; it will contain a relatively large number of big and well-connected pores and, therefore, its coefficient of permeability will be high. As hydration progresses, most of the pores will be reduced to small size (100 nm or less) and will also lose their interconnections; thus the permeability drops. The coefficient of permeability of hcp when most of the capillary pores are small and disconnected is of the order of 10-12 cm/s. It is observed that in normal cement pastes the discontinuity in the capillary network is generally reached when the capillary porosity is about 30%. With 0,40 , 0,50 , 0,60 and 0,70 W/C ratio pastes this generally happens in 3, 14, 180 and 365 days of moist curing, respectively. Since the W/C ratio in most concrete mixtures seldom exceeds 0,70, it should be obvious that in well-cured concrete the cement paste is not the principal contributing factor to the coefficient of permeability.

2.2.2.  Permeability of Aggregates

Compared to 30 to 40% capillary porosity of typical hcps, the volume of pores in most natural aggregates is usually under 8% and rarely exceeds 10%. Thus, it is expected that permeability of aggregate would be much lower than that of typical cement paste. This may not necessarily be the case. It is shown that the coefficient of permeability of aggregates are as variable as those of hcp of W/C ratios in the range of ~0,4 to 0,7. The reason some aggregates, with as low as 10% porosity, may have much higher permeability than cement paste is because the size of capillary pores in aggregate is much larger than cement paste. (Most of capillary porosity in nature hcp is 10-100nm; average pores in aggregate > 10 mm ; 100 – 1000 times greater than pores in hcp).

2.2.3.  Permeability of Concrete

Theoretically, the interaction of aggregate particles of low permeability into a cement paste is expected to reduce the permeability of the system, because the aggregate particles should intercept the channels of flow within the cement paste matrix. Therefore, compared to neat cement paste, mortar or concrete with the same W/C ratio and degree of maturity, should give a lower coefficient of permeability. However, this is not the case, and the addition of aggregates to cement paste or mortar increases the permeability considerably. The permeability of concrete depends mainly on the W/C ratio and degree of hydration (Which controls the size, volume and continuity of capillary pores) as well as maximum aggregate size (which determines the microcracking in the transition zone between coarse aggregate and cement paste); in fact, the larger the max aggregate size, the greater the coefficient of permeability.
Owing to the significance of the permeability to physical and chemical processes of deterioration of concrete, a brief review of the factors controlling permeability of concrete should be useful. Since strength and permeability are related to each other through the capillary porosity, as a first approximation the factors that influence the strength also affect the permeability (Fig.2.2).

Fig 2.2 Influence of capillary porosity on comp.  strength and coefficient of permeability

 A reduction in the volume of a large capillary pores (>100 nm pores) in the hcp matrix would reduce the permeability. This would be possible by using low W/C ratio, adequate cement content, proper compaction and curing. Similarly proper attention to aggregate maximum size & grading, thermal & drying shrinkage strains, and avoiding premature or excessive loading are necessary steps to limit the transition zone microcracking which appear to be the major cause of high permeability in concrete. Finally, the thickness of the concrete element is of importance since it determines the tortuosity of the path of fluid flow, which in turn, determines permeability.